1
intraduisibles : « When thou hast done, thou hast
not
done » (vers 5) peut signifier aussi : « Quand tu auras ce Donne, tu
2
en trois jours, c’est impossible ! — Sorry, sir !
Not
a thing. — Regardez bien… (mais elle a raccroché). Cinq minutes plus
3
en trois jours, c’est impossible ! — Sorry, sir !
Not
a thing. — Regardez bien… (mais elle a raccroché). Cinq minutes plus
4
alle : « The task before us, at this congress, is
not
only to raise the voice of Europe as a united home… We must here and
5
caine : « This “death of God” as a psychological,
not
ontological, phenomenon poses some very specific questions for Christ
6
américaine traduit un peu différemment : « man is
not
what he imagines himself, not what he feels about himself, but what h
7
éremment : « man is not what he imagines himself,
not
what he feels about himself, but what he has done ». o. L’édition am
8
f the eternal illusions of mankind, and we should
not
be misled by their pretending to be extremely matter-of-fact and cyni
9
salle : “The task before us, at this congress, is
not
only to raise the voice of Europe as a united home. We must here and
10
e of that kind in some ways has to continue. I do
not
mean that in the sense that, if it is doing something useful, it shou
11
that, if it is doing something useful, it should
not
be stopped. But providing it is doing something useful, and doing it
12
to finish a rather rambling speech — since I did
not
know I had to make one — I think CERN has been a success. One is talk
13
e purpose of the Cern Is for mankind to learn
Not
for cities to burn. Voué à la connaissance pure, sans nulle tricheri
14
ssing this problem with Prince Bernhard. If I had
not
received your letters before having had time to write, I would have m
15
e la culture, le Conseil de l’Europe et, last but
not
least, le Centre européen de la culture. Nos vœux les plus sincères,
16
ofmannsthal, Hermann Broch, Musil, enfin last but
not
least, la psychanalyse avec Freud et Adler. C’est une chose absolumen
17
à géométrie variable. M. Norton écrit : « We need
not
fear that we cannot manage implications of non-coincidence of boundar
18
cations of non-coincidence of boundaries, we need
not
fear those complications ; one cannot meet complexities in advance, b
19
s États-Unis d’Europe (André Philip) et, last but
not
least, l’Union européenne des fédéralistes (Henri Brugmans, Alexandre
20
d’une miraculeuse simplicité : « If the end does
not
justify the means, then what does ? »… Belle question socratique ! Ka